Showing posts with label Baxter State Park. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Baxter State Park. Show all posts

Thursday, January 27, 2022

Thru Stories: That Time I Didn’t Go Hypothermic Because I Had Already Gone Hypothermic

 

Jack and I entering Baxter.  2003 was so long ago
everything was in Black and White. 



Note: while NHTM is for the most part a (hopefully) humorous blog, hypothermia is no joke.  Please avail yourself of the helpful links in this story to learn more about it.  I’ve also included some unhelpful links if you just want a laugh.


“Good judgement comes from experience.  And experience?  Well, that comes from bad judgement.”


There may be people who are good at learning from experience, but generally speaking that’s not true of me.  Hell, I’ve completed seven long hikes on six trails and I still haven’t figured out that I don’t particularly like walking.  But every once in a while — usually when I almost die — I am not The Boy Who Doesn’t Learn.

This story is one of those whiles.


In 2008 I was hiking the PCT and found myself in Washington State rather late in the Fall.  I'd like to say that this was due to a late start date or severe injury or at least the vague catchall phrase “circumstances beyond my control.”  But if I’m honest the real reasons would include the also-kind-of-vague but not as self-absolving “having way too much fun in California.”

Rough (but normal) conditions in Washington

In any case, Washington State was doing what Washington State does late in the Fall — dropping the temps, dropping cold rain, dropping the snowline.  And in the process, dropping my core temperature.  The last couple of weeks were a town-to-town slog, pushing big miles to get to the next resupply before EVERYTHING was soaking wet.  And constantly considering the fine line between uncomfortable and dangerous.


I was a couple of days North out of White Pass hiking solo on a cold and rainy day when I arrived at Chinook Pass.  And the thing about Chinook Pass is: there are very nice bathrooms there that would be excellent to sleep in.  And by this point in the hike, sleeping in a warm, dry bathroom was definitely an attractive option.  However, even though by this time I was walking to the rhythm of my teeth chattering, it seemed too early in the day to stop.  So on I pushed, into a wet, foggy day that was getting wetter and foggier as I hiked.



Chinook Pass, where I didn't sleep in a bathroom.


I was aiming for Government Meadow and Mike Ulrich Cabin.  Much like a bathroom, the cabin would provide shelter from the elements.  In addition it had a wood stove, and hopefully also had the hikers who had left Packwood the day before me.


But at a certain point it was getting dark, the temperature was dropping further, and the fog was so thick I could no longer guarantee that I could stay on trail and end up at Government Meadow.  More importantly, I was feeling the beginnings of the onset of hypothermia.  I was only a couple of miles away from a warm, dry cabin.  It was tempting to push on.  What to do?


Decision time.  Fortunately not a last known photo.

Foremost in my mind at that point was my poor decision making a few years earlier in 2003.  Some friends were finishing their AT Thru-hikes, and I joined them for the 100 Mile Wilderness and Katahdin.  This was probably my first bad decision.  Have you ever tried to get off the couch, brush the Cheez-Its off your chest, and keep up with Thru-hikers finishing a trail?  It seemed effortless for them; for me it seemed like something I had been sentenced to by a particularly cruel Judge.  Every part of me ached for every minute and by the end I had trench foot and a simmering distrust of my friends who said it would be AMAZING.


2003 was a particularly rainy year on the AT, and that Fall in Maine was no exception.  It was late on a cold, rainy day when I left East Branch Lean-To — where some of the crew I was hiking with were now safely tucked into their sleeping bags — and pushed on to meet Baltimore Jack at Cooper Brook Falls Lean-To.  Those hikers looked warm and dry at East Branch.  I wanted desperately to stay.  But I had told Jack I’d meet him, and I didn’t want him worrying about me (or worse — backtracking in the bad weather trying to find me).  So on I hiked, after one last jealous glance back at those done for the day.



Cooper Brook Lean-To in 2015.  Note the obligatory
mystery underwear hanging on the wall.


It was only about 8 miles to the shelter.  Doable, and I thought I was moving pretty fast in the cold & wet.  At a certain point, though, I stopped to get water and eat a snack.  I sat down, shivering.  I took my gloves off.  I continued to sit.  In the cold.  In the rain.  I lost feeling in my hands.  I stopped shivering.  Something in me snapped me out of the fog I had fallen into and told me I had to move.  I got up and started walking, but I didn’t put my gloves back on.  It was dark now, but I decided that getting my headlamp out of my pack would take too long.  This had the effect of slowing me down dramatically as it continued to rain, and eventually led to me blowing right past the blue blaze that marked the side trail to the shelter.


But only a hundred yards past it, as the trail went uphill to the left, that same thing that snapped me out of my previous stupor told me I had passed the shelter.  I worked my way backwards, straining in the dark to see the blue blaze.  I eventually found it, and made my way down to the shelter.

There was a lot of scary stuff happening in the last two paragraphs, but by this time I didn’t have the wherewithal to realize it.


Fortunately, Jack was at the shelter (which I realized afterwards wasn’t guaranteed).  And from this point on I have no memory of what happened, and have to rely on Jack’s telling of the tale.


He said that I stumbled into the shelter, dropped my pack, sat on the deck, and proceeded to do nothing.  Just sat there staring at nothing.  Jack asked me what I was doing and I mumbled, “just resting for a minute.”


Jack said that at that point he realized from my behavior and my condition that I was showing signs of being deep enough into hypothermia that he needed to spring into action.  He started ordering me around, starting with telling me to get out of my wet clothes.  Which I couldn’t do.  So he got me undressed and into my long underwear and then into my (fortunately) dry sleeping bag.  He boiled water, put it in a Nalgene, and had me place it in my armpit.  He fed me hot stew and then some warmed water.  And he kept me awake through all of that.


Eventually the grogginess lifted and I remember being in my sleeping bag with no idea how I got there.  Jack hovering over me, talking to me and looking at me with concern.  Gradually I regained full mental function.


Now that I think about it, my friends would probably dispute whether I ever have full mental function.  “You can’t regain something you’ve never had!”  But at least I was thinking relatively clearly again.  I believe that at the point he started treating me I was somewhere in the middle of HT II (moderate hypothermia) and spiraling downward.  Did I die?  That I’m writing this would suggest no.  On the other hand, there’s a fair amount of evidence that I’m such a stubborn person that maybe I did die and have been choosing to ignore that fact for the past 19 years.



But I’m pretty sure I’m alive.  And there’s little doubt in my mind that if Jack hadn’t been there — or if he didn’t know what to do — I wouldn’t be.  Instead of dying I got a harsh lesson about the limits of my expertise, and the urge to make sure I never put myself in that position again.

Then in 2008 in Washington State I went right ahead and put myself in that position again.

But not exactly.

This time, I was aware of what was happening.  I had been monitoring my hand dexterity all day.  I knew the signs and symptoms to look for — I was on top of “the umbles.”  And as I did mental checks on my condition my goal was to (if necessary) catch hypothermia in the mild stage when I could self-treat and arrest the progression.  In other words, do all of the things Jack had done for me back in ’03 in Maine when I could no longer help myself.


So did I hike on towards Government Meadow?

No.


Government Meadow from Ulrich Cabin.


My headlamp was bouncing off the thick fog and I couldn’t see a thing.  In fact, the next day I found out I had passed a tent about five feet off the trail without seeing it.  I was shivering, and my hand dexterity had degraded to the point that if I waited to set my tent up much longer I didn’t think I’d be able to.  A warm, dry cabin was definitely a better place to end up, but I suspected that I might not end up there.  So while I still had my wits about me I set up my tent, stripped out of my wets, got into my dry long underwear, and slid into my sleeping bag.  I cooked a hot meal in my vestibule — not ideal, but I wasn’t going to do it in the cold rain — and then warmed up some water to drink.  At no time did I fall into the deep mental fog that affected me in 2003, but I had felt a bit addled and it took me a while to warm up.  I believe stopping when I did was the smart move.



Tex, Karen, and I drying out at Ulrich Cabin


The next day I did my shortest day on the trail — about three miles to Ulrich Cabin.  I was joined by Tex and Karen, whose tent I had passed in the fog.  We decided to bag further hiking for the day, chop some wood, and spend the day recovering by the wood stove and drying our gear and clothing.  It was a good day, and it was a smart move.


And when I made it to Snoqualmie Pass 46 miles later, I got a room at The Summit Inn and sat in their hot tub for two hours.  Which might have been the smartest move of all.


Heading to Snoqualmie.  Post-crisis but pre-hot tub.


(for another story about what happened in my tent that night in 2008, click HERE)


Thanks to Andi Lowry for the inspiration to get off my metaphorical butt and write this story down (I was on my actual butt when I wrote it).




Tuesday, February 2, 2016

The Northern Terminus Of The Appalachian Trail: A Modest Proposal

Katahdin, topped with either clouds or an unacceptable
amount of pot smoke, depending on whom you ask.

The Background


  On November 19th, 2014, Jensen Bissell, the Director of Baxter State Park, sent a letter to Ron Tipton and Wendy Janssen.  Ron Tipton is the Executive Director of the ATC and is also a former AT thru-hiker (1978).  Wendy Janssen is the Superintendent of the Appalachian National Scenic Trail and to my surprise is NOT also the female protagonist in Peter Pan.

In the letter, Director Bissell outlines his concerns about the increasing number of thru-hikers that has risen to a shocking and unsustainable 3% of the 63,000+ annual park gate visitors, and notes that ATC’s vision of more people enjoying outdoor recreation runs counter to the Park Authority’s vision of a “fixed capacity” of non-car driving visitors who will enter the park and not act like complete idiots, or at the very least will not share their acts of idiocy on social media.

In addition to concerns about sheer numbers, the letter includes a list of observed bad behavior and neediness by thru-hikers in the park that is “not meant . . . to serve as a litany of complaints,” but manages to serve quite well in that capacity anyway, in the same way that anything said before the phrase “no offense intended” was probably incredibly offensive.

Summing up, the letter calls on ATC and the NPS to come up with a plan to do something about hiker numbers and behavior in a section of the trail that the letter also points out “has no federal designation and is under the control of the Baxter State Park Authority.”  Director Bissell’s letter was of great concern to the AT hiking community, not only because the previous sentence makes no sense, but also because of the not-so-subtle threat that if someone other than BSPA didn’t come up with a solution, THEIR solution might involve “relocating . . . the trail terminus.”




The 2015 Season


Fast forward to July of 2015, when, as a result of his summit shenanigans, record-setter Scott Jurek was cited for drinking alcohol, spilling alcohol, and for having too large a group with him when he did the previously mentioned things with the alcohol.  In a plea deal Jurek pleaded guilty to drinking and was assessed a fine that Penobscot County District Attorney R. Christopher Almy admitted was $300 greater than a public drinking summons would typically carry under state law.  That may seem unfair, but at least he wasn’t cited for speeding.


It was, however, Jurek’s Clif Bar headband that really seemed to bother Director Bissell.  In a Facebook post, Bissell noted that “Scott Jurek’s physical abilities were recognized by corporations engaged in (selling) running and outdoor related products . . . The race vehicle used to support Scott in his run, as well as Scott’s headband, clearly displays these corporate sponsors.”

And as it turns out Baxter does NOT like corporate commercialism, which might come as a bit of a surprise to L.L. Bean, not only because they received four commercial filming permits in Baxter from 2012 to 2013, but also because they sell a line of jackets called “Baxter State Parkas."
Just in case you thought "Baxter
State Parkas" was a joke.
One would think that the simple solution to people breaking the rules in Baxter State Park, regardless of who they are or how they got there, would be for Baxter State Park employees to enforce the rules they are tasked with enforcing.  It turns out that many people stop breaking rules once it becomes clear that there are consequences, which is why, for example, “Mooning The Cog” on Mount Washington isn’t as much of a thing anymore, and why most hikers get Smokies Permits when they hear there’s a Ranger checking for them at Newfound Gap.


But in the past few months there have been a series of meetings involving BSPA, ATC, NPS, MATC, ALDHA, FBSP, and, oh, I don’t know, HYOH, NIMBY, and YMMV, and “enforce the Park rules for everyone” doesn’t seem to have been an option anyone is particularly interested in attempting.


The Proposal


My initial thought was that the solution lay in getting Clif Bar to sponsor every thru-hiker, since it seems that Baxter is only interested in citing high profile, sponsored hikers for the sake of making a point.  This, however, seems like an unlikely solution.  Clif Bar couldn’t possibly be interested in sponsoring hundreds of willfully homeless dirtbags with entitlement issues and delusions of grandeur.  And from the other direction, thru-hikers wouldn’t be interested in Clif Bar sponsorships because after two months of eating them Clif Bars taste like cardboard and despair.

And even if that plan was possible, it wouldn’t account for Baxter’s concerns about the sheer numbers of hikers, because, as previously mentioned, Baxter has a “fixed capacity model” in place.

Unless maybe you’re a visitor who isn’t on the AT.
In 2014 Baxter State Park had 63,049 folks come in through their gates.  Back in 2002 the number was 8,605 people higher (71,654!), or more than four times the number who came into (or out of) the park via the Appalachian Trail in 2014.  I suppose that if you can fit inside a vehicle you can also fit into Governor Percival Baxter’s vision.   

In any case, Baxter apparently can’t handle more AT hikers.  We’ll just have to take their word for it.

So the only rational option left is to bypass Baxter State Park entirely and move the Northern Terminus of the Appalachian Trail to the A.T. Cafe in Millinocket.


The new proposed route for the AT

After crossing Abol Bridge, with its magnificent views of Katahdin, Northbounders would continue along the Golden Road for an additional 19.4 miles and finish their hikes at a terminus sign on the sidewalk in front of the Cafe on Penobscot Avenue.  Along the way they’ll walk along the confusingly named River Pond, enjoy striking views of Millinocket Lake, and try desperately to see and breathe as loggers and hunters throw up clouds of dust at high speeds.  As an added bonus, siting the A.T. on a road means that “thru-hikers” who have been yellow blazing up the trail can get in one last celebratory hitch before heading home and submitting to the ATC for their 2000-Miler certificates and patches.




A triumphant end to a thru-hike!
Moving a terminus may seem extreme, but the A.T. has a history of doing so.  In 1958, the southern terminus of the Appalachian Trail was moved from Mount Oglethorpe (arguably a more dramatic mountain than Springer) after hikers complained about being covered in a thick layer of chicken poop.  Today, southbounders claim that finishing their hikes on Springer is not at all depressing or anti-climactic.

And although they are absolutely lying about that, for the purposes of this editorial we’ll pretend to believe them.

And so it will be with the relatively chicken-poop-free A.T. Cafe.  Northbound hikers will finish their hikes and be able to celebrate by doing things that would be objectionable in the Park -- they can have a beer AND a milkshake without worrying about spilling either on the ground.  They can write their name on things (in this case, ceiling tiles).

Tagging in the AT Cafe.
They can get a place to sleep in town without “strain[ing] the current system beyond its capacity.”  Southbound hikers can start their trip with a cheeseburger AND not have to deal with the logistics of getting to Baxter.  And should a hiker do anything in the A.T. Cafe that the staff finds objectionable, I am confident they will kick the offender out on their ass without feeling the need to enlist the aid of the ATC or complain to the Portland Press Herald.

Bonus: Summit Sundae NOT available on summit of Katahdin.
 As you can imagine, though, I would highly recommend getting a shuttle into Baxter State Park to walk up Katahdin once a thru-hiker’s trip on the A.T. is completed (or before it begins, for southbounders).  It would be a shame to be so close to such a magnificent mountain and not climb it, and who knows when they’d be that close again? 

Of course, at that point Baxter’s distinction between “AT Hikers” (“a user group not defined in [their] trust mission”) and “members of the public” (a group that apparently is part of the trust mission but doesn’t include thru-hikers) disappears.
They’ll just be visitors in the park, no different than any other hiker on the mountain, and their behavior won’t be the responsibility of (or reflect poorly on) anyone but themselves.

The Beginning Of A New Ending?



Photo Credit: Katahdin Photo by Michael Muzzillo